Customs decisions and challenges
Review the decision, supporting records and disputed findings. Identify the appropriate procedure and deadlines requiring verification.
Legal assistance for individuals and businesses dealing with Moldova’s Customs Service: import and export records, assessed amounts and disputed decisions.
Call for a consultation · +373 78 508 311Review the decision, supporting records and disputed findings. Identify the appropriate procedure and deadlines requiring verification.
Examine inconsistencies between declarations, invoices and supporting explanations concerning customs value, tariff classification or origin.
Organise commercial documents and correspondence for advice on transactions, requests for records and post-clearance findings.
Review the legal basis and calculation of amounts claimed and the type of penalty decision. Review procedures may differ according to the decision.
Record when each document was received and the outcome you are seeking. Identify the findings or amounts disputed and your supporting evidence. The right to respond before a decision and challenging an issued decision are different stages. Do not assume every request suspends enforcement.
Ask for a review of the reasons and documents supporting the declared value. A lawyer can assess appropriate steps; the outcome depends on the records and circumstances.
Yes. Prepare purchase, transport and declaration documents and any decision or request received from customs.
The procedure and deadline depend on the type of decision, service date and applicable rules. Explain when you received the documents at the first contact.
General information checked on 30 October 2026. The applicable law and steps depend on the circumstances.
Group records by declaration or shipment: contract, invoice, payment, transport and correspondence. Keep amounts and explanations for different imports separate. Identify who filed the declaration and what information was used.
For disputed valuation or classification, identify the precise disagreement and supporting record. An invoice alone may not explain the whole transaction. Product specifications and evidence of commercial terms can be relevant.
A preliminary communication and a final decision require different approaches. Check what explanations are requested and when they are due. Retain submission evidence and compare the decision’s reasons with arguments already presented.
Flag effects on release of goods, storage costs and other contracts. These consequences need documentation, not merely estimates. Legal steps depend on urgency, the nature of the act and the applicable special rules.
When arranging an appointment, briefly describe the issue, intended result and any approaching deadline. Prepare a timeline and a list of available and missing documents. Send sensitive records only after agreeing a communication channel. The consultation should clarify options, risks and steps requiring further evidence. Document preparation, representation and related expenses depend on the agreed scope of engagement; making an appointment should not be assumed to include all these services.