Offence reports
We assess the description of the alleged act, the officer’s competence, the form of the record and the evidence supporting the sanction.
Challenging offence reports and sanctions in Moldova: reviewing records and evidence and preparing a defence for the particular case.
Request a consultation ↗Before filing an application or challenge, we review the facts, records and relevant time limits. Advice is tailored to the case; a complete assessment requires examining the documents.
We assess the description of the alleged act, the officer’s competence, the form of the record and the evidence supporting the sanction.
We examine lawfulness, proportionality and available ways to challenge or vary the sanction.
Review of video recordings, diagrams, reports and other material relevant to establishing the circumstances.
Preparation of challenges, evidence requests and procedural submissions according to the applicable time limit and procedure.
We establish the date of service, remaining time, competent authority and available evidence before choosing the appropriate procedural remedy.
We identify the facts, relevant rights and existing records.
We assess options, time limits, costs and risks.
We prepare the steps agreed in the legal assistance contract.
This list is indicative. Agree a secure communication channel before sharing confidential case documents.
The period must be established from the act received and applicable procedure. Check it immediately.
Yes, where they are legally relevant to the lawfulness or merits of the sanction.
They can be assessed according to their origin, relevance and procedural rules.
Identify the document received, the alleged conduct and any separate penalty decision. Keep all pages and proof of service. The challenge must be defined from the documents themselves rather than informal descriptions.
Photographs, recordings, technical records and people present may clarify events. Preserve complete materials and their dates. Explain what contradicts the officer’s findings and avoid presenting interpretations as directly observed facts.
Review both procedural compliance and whether the alleged conduct is established and attributable to the person penalised. Formal omissions do not all have identical consequences. Their significance and possible remedy depend on the applicable rules and particular act.
Provide receipt dates and details of any payment. Flag effects on driving or professional activity immediately. The consequences of payment and a challenge must be checked separately, without assuming automatic suspension.
When arranging an appointment, briefly describe the issue, intended result and any approaching deadline. Prepare a timeline and a list of available and missing documents. Send sensitive records only after agreeing a communication channel. The consultation should clarify options, risks and steps requiring further evidence. Document preparation, representation and related expenses depend on the agreed scope of engagement; making an appointment should not be assumed to include all these services.